0
SweetFreedom Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

The term "Indian massacre" ?

The context seems to say that the term "Indian massacre" can mean two opposite meanings:
(1) It could refer to "Indians kill European people (or other)".
(2) It could refer to "European people kill Indians".
Am I on the right track?

Background info:

In the history of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_colonization_of_the_Americas, the term "Indian massacre" was often used to describe either mass killings of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European-American by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Americans_in_the_United_States of the North American continent (Indians) or mass killings of indigenous people perpetrated by the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European-American and/or other http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Americans_in_the_United_States.

MOre:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_massacre
  

Top answer

Am I on the right track? Partly. The article refers to 'people of European descent', not 'Europeans'.

  • Am I on the right track?
  • Partly.
  • The article refers to 'people of European descent', not 'Europeans'.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
SweetFreedomThe context seems to say that the term "Indian massacre" can mean two opposite meanings:(1) It could refer to "Indians kill European people (or other)".(2) It could refer to "European people kill Indians".Am I on the right track?
Partly. The article refers to 'people of European descent', not 'Europeans'.

Related Questions