Hi Icadia It seems to me that you're trying to get a "black and white" answer for a question that doesn't have a black and white answer. Meaning is often extremely dependent on context. Not only have you provided incomplete sentences, but you have not provided any broader context either.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Icadiawhich tense should I use in the sentence above when I want to refer to something in the future?If you were sure he would come, ... for the idea that he might come in the future. If you were sure he had come, ... for the idea that he might have already come in the past.
CalifJimIf you were sure he would come, ... for the idea that he might come in the future.Hi, CalifJim. Does "would" imply here some kind of less probability it will happen which is similar to "should" in if-clause?
FandorinDoes "would" imply here some kind of less probability it will happen which is similar to "should" in if-clause?If I understand you correctly, the answer is "No".
FandorinI'm a bit confused about "would" in if-clause. I guess I get it. "would/should" here are modals, aren't they?can, could, will, would, shall, should, may, might, and must are always modals. But read Yankee's post carefully (partially quoted again below). That's the key.
Technically, the word "would" is not actually in the IF-claus
then using "will" instead of "would" is incorrect?Yes. I would say that If you were sure he will come, ... is incorrect.
In this situation, should "Jane" say "If he knew that the party would be held tomorrow, I wouldn't attend“?That sounds fine to me (although I don't know why you bothered with the elaborate set up regarding Max and