The table illustrates the opinions of club representatives and the general public for the new theater in 3 main features were facilities, quality, and the information in one town in 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of members had excellent judgment for the quality, while the public voted for the information. As it is highlighted, the information gained poor evaluation by both sides.
As for club members, excellent quality was responsible for 88%, which was higher than the facilities about 16% (72%), followed by the information with 54%. Ranking second was the satisfying feeling about the information with 30%, the facilities were apparently quite good with 26%. However, the quality just acquired 10% for the satisfaction. Meanwhile, both quality and facilities attained 2% for the poor pleasure, the information registered the highest with 16%.
In contrast to club members, for excellent, the general society evaluated the information as the best in 3 items with 66%, ranking second and third were the facilities and quality with 64% and 53% respectively. After that, the satisfaction for quality was the highest with 405, followed by facilities with 24%. And the information was lower than 4% with 20%. As for the club members, the figure for poor feelings about the information was by far the highest, which accounted for 14%. Compared to the facilities with 8%, the quality is less than 1% with 7%.
Where is the table? Click on: - "Answer" - Attach images (near the top right) - Choose Files (upload the image) - Add to post
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Where is the table?
Click on:
- "Answer"
- Attach images (near the top right)
- Choose Files (upload the image)
- Add to post