0
Christophe Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

The Subjunctive - is it or not?

Hello All,

I would be most grateful if anyone could clarify a point of confusion regarding the two sentences below. I have exhausted the print and electronic resources available to me without finding a fully satisfactory answer.

Sentence One: "I thought that you were my friend."

The reality is, however, that you were not. Is this a true example of the subjunctive or is it just the past tense in a construction that bears a superficial resemblance to the subjunctive?

Sentence Two: "I thought that Thanksgiving was on the 24th this year."

Thanksgiving was, in fact, on the 23rd. In a similar manner, since the sentence expresses a condition contrary to reality, would it not require the subjunctive as well? But "was" would appear to be necessary in the subordinate clause and I have never seen any grammar that cites it as a subjunctive form of "to be". So once again, is this really just an example of the past tense?

Thank you so much, in advance, for any assistance that you might be able to supply.

Regards,

Christopher

  

Top answer

'were' appears because of 'you'. if there were 'he' is would be 'was'. However teachers will help you much more.

  • 'were' appears because of 'you'.
  • if there were 'he' is would be 'was'.
  • However teachers will help you much more.
  • But why do you think (1) is subjunctive?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
'were' appears because of 'you'. if there were 'he' is would be 'was'. However teachers will help you much more.
But why do you think (1) is subjunctive?
0
Hello, both of you!
I think Christophe's sentences are related to reported speech in the past, not to subjonctive.
Direct speech: "But you are my friend!" (more or less!)
Rep speech: "I thought that you were my friend"
On the other hand, this would be a subjunctive:
"He always behaved as if he were my friend"
The sentences introduced by "I thought that" are the same
0
I thought that it was in the subjunctive because it contained a notion in the subordinate clause that was either false or at the very least subject to doubt. There were two things that led me to believe this. The first was numerous references similar to the following passage:

"Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary defines subjunctive as “in grammar, designating or of that mood o
0
If you transalte your example in French,there's subjunctive either:
"je croyais que tu étais mon ami"
Emotion: smile
0
In English, uses of past subjunctive mood are restricted only to some special sub-clauses: , , <(wish)-clause>, <(I would rather)-clause>, <(It's time)-clause>. You don't need to use the subjunctive mood in <(think) that-clause> even in the case the event stated in the clause is unreal. "I thought he was my friend, but I was wrong."

paco

Related Questions