0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar
The same meaning?
1. She was so angry that she tore the letter up.
2. She was too angry not to tear the letter up.
3. She was angry enough to tear the letter up.
Do they have the same meaning?
2. She was too angry not to tear the letter up.
3. She was angry enough to tear the letter up.
Do they have the same meaning?
Top answer
Anonymous Do they have the same meaning? In essence, yes. #2 emphasizes the superabundance of anger.
- Anonymous Do they have the same meaning?
- In essence, yes.
- #2 emphasizes the superabundance of anger.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
AnonymousDo they have the same meaning?In essence, yes. #2 emphasizes the superabundance of anger.
0
Related Questions