0
Anonymous Posted 4 years ago
Grammar

The Republicans who buoyed him to the Oval Office

Harwood at that time had said that Trump and the Republicans who buoyed him to the Oval Office in 2016 were “fundamentally broken”, making them particularly challenging to cover for journalists who operated in good faith.

The Guardian.

I'm not quite sure whether I understand the NP the Republicans who buoyed him to the Oval Office in 2016.

My question is:

Does the relative clause in the NP define all Republicans (all members of the GOP) or only and only those of them who voted Trump into the White House?

  

Top answer

anonymous the Republicans who buoyed him to the Oval Office in 2016 anonymous Does the relative clause in the NP define all Republicans (all members of the GOP) No. Not as I read it. Conveying that meaning would require commas around the relative clause.

  • anonymous the Republicans who buoyed him to the Oval Office in 2016 anonymous Does the relative clause in the NP define all Republicans (all members of the GOP) No.
  • Not as I read it.
  • Conveying that meaning would require commas around the relative clause.
  • anonymous or only those and only those ( of them ) who voted Trump into the White House?
  • Basically yes, but with the proviso that 'buoyed' is not the same as 'voted for'.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
anonymousthe Republicans who buoyed him to the Oval Office in 2016
anonymousDoes the relative clause in the NP define all Republicans (all members of the GOP)

No. Not as I read it. Conveying that meaning would require commas around the relative clause.

anonymousor only

Related Questions