0
Anonymous Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

The question about preposition?

1) i am confused how to use prep

My teacher say that emphasis should be used with the prep "on"

(1)They put the emphasis on quality.

(2)The emphasis of/on quality should be pay attention to. <<Which prep is right?

2) resquest (n) + for + something

If i don't want to memtion "something", Can i say "Her resquest is unreasonable." and why?

3) pay attention(n) + to

If i don't want to memtion "something", Can i say "his mun never pay attention" and why?
  

Top answer

Hello, Anon. 1) I would use ON. 3) I think there should be 'something' in your example, "His mum never pays attention to it".

  • Hello, Anon.
  • 1) I would use ON.
  • 3) I think there should be 'something' in your example, "His mum never pays attention to it".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
Hello, Anon.

1) I would use ON.

3) I think there should be 'something' in your example, "His mum never pays attention to it".
0
Hello Anon

(2)The emphasis of/on quality should be pay attention to. <<Which prep is right?

— I think you want to say "The emphasis on quality should be paid attention to".

2) resquest (n) + for + something

If i don't want to memtion "something", Can i say "Her resquest is unreasonable." and why?

— "Her request is unreasonable" is fine.
0
Yes. It's "emphasis on", "request for", and "pay attention to".
And yes, if there is no "something" you must omit the preposition.

The emphasis on quality was a good idea.
The emphasis should not be obvious.

Oliver's request for more gruel is outrageous.
Oliver's request is outrageous.

Mother never pays attention to us.
Mother never pays a
0
Is there any exception ?I mean if there is no "something" but the preposition cannot be omitted.

Thank you for helping me^^
0
The definition of 'preposition' implies that something follows. So on the basis of the definition of 'preposition', I would have to say no, there is no exception.

CJ
0
i still have one question...

e.g. parent should take care of their children.

If the above sentence change to passive voice: Their children should be "taken care of /take care" ??
0
It's "should be taken care of" because "of" relates to "children".

Related Questions