Ant_222 Maybe it would not sound as good, but I'd definitely put "only" before "by", because I think it should be located before the noun (or verb) that it modifies, which in our case is "the sounds of a footfall". Is my reasoning faulty? Your reasoning seems fine.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Ant_222Maybe it would not sound as good, but I'd definitely put "only" before "by", because I think it should be located before the noun (or verb) that it modifies, which in our case is "the sounds of a footfall". Is my reasoning faulty?Your reasoning seems fine. There isn't any real difference between the two versions. I'd say that it's just a matter of styl
Ant_222the reason behind placing "only" before "broken":In idiomatic English, and contrary to logic (to the dismay of many), only "floats to the left", usually to a position just after the subject. The result is that onlymay sometimes be found at an ungodly distance from its partner.
CalifJimAnt_222the reason behind placing "only" before "broken":In idiomatic English, and contrary to logic (to the dismay of many), only "floats to the left", usually to a position just after the subject. The result is that only may sometimes be found at an ungodly distance from its partner.
Philipthe float to the left lawOh, Philip, why did I know I would pique your interest (reaction?) with my remarks on this one? Let's say strong tendency rather than law. I'm certainly not claiming that your preference on the placement of onlyis ungrammatical.
CalifJimPhilipthe float to the left lawOh, Philip, why did I know I would pique your interest (reaction?) with my remarks on this one? Let's say strong tendency rather than law. I'm certainly not claiming that your preference on the placement of only is ungrammatical.