0
Sb70012 Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

The police officer was waiting for her whom she met ten years ago by the same bridge.

a) The police officer was waiting for her whom she met ten years ago by the same bridge.

Source: school exam

Hello,
The above blue sentence is wrong but I don't know which part of the sentence has made it wrong. I want to know that which part of the sentence has a wrong word order that makes it wrong.
I asked this question in http://forum.wordreference.com/threads/the-police-officer-was-waiting.3222388/#post-16310218. One native English speaker said that "for her whom she" is the odd word order that makes the whole sentence wrong.

But if "for her whom she" is wrong, then one other native English speaker gave me a sentence that proves that "for her whom she" is OK. Look at this => We are waiting for him whom you met by the bridge. => correct

Could you please be kind enough to tell me that which part of this sentence is odd? I'll be grateful.

Tahnk you.
  

Top answer

sb70012 Could you please be kind enough to tell me that which part of this sentence is odd? I certainly don't like either sentence one little bit. They may be constructed according to grammar principles, but they are not competently native.

  • sb70012 Could you please be kind enough to tell me that which part of this sentence is odd?
  • I certainly don't like either sentence one little bit.
  • They may be constructed according to grammar principles, but they are not competently native.
  • Just recast: The police officer was waiting for the woman she met ten years ago by the same bridge.
  • We are waiting for t he man you met by the bridge.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
sb70012Could you please be kind enough to tell me that which part of this sentence is odd?
I certainly don't like either sentence one little bit. They may be constructed according to grammar principles, but they are not competently native. Just recast:

The police officer was waiting for the woman she met ten years ago by the same bridge.
0
Mister MicawberThe police officer was waiting for the woman she met ten years ago by the same bridge.
Thank you but why don't you use "her" instead of "the woman"? If that's the problem, then the sentence shouldn't be incorrect. Should it?

Thank you.
0
sb70012 why don't you use "her" instead of "the woman"?
We don't do it that way.
0
Is it also correct if I use "whom" after "the woman"?

I mean: The police officer was waiting for the woman whom she met ten years ago by the same bridge.
0
sb70012The police officer was waiting for the woman whom she met ten years ago by the same bridge.
Yes, that works much better than your other permutations.
0
sb70012The police officer was waiting for her whom she met ten years ago by the same bridge.
By the way, if 'police officer' and 'she' are coreferential, the police officer is a woman. If those are not supposed to be coreferential, there may be three people involved here.

Officer O'Malley was waiting for Bet

Related Questions