0
Peaceblinkfriend Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

The party that fires at UN troops is drawing fire to itself.

Hi all

Does this sound natural? I am not sure whether I've used this phrase correctly?

The party that fires at UN troops will be drawing fire to itself.

Thanks

PBF
  

Top answer

PBF: It's fine. I would use "would only" to show the folly of their future actions, if that is the intended meaning. "would only be drawing fire to itself".

  • PBF: It's fine.
  • I would use "would only" to show the folly of their future actions, if that is the intended meaning.
  • "would only be drawing fire to itself".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
PBF: It's fine. I would use "would only" to show the folly of their future actions, if that is the intended meaning.

"would only be drawing fire to itself".
0
Hi,

Does this sound natural? I am not sure whether I've used this phrase correctly?



The party that fires at UN troops will be drawing fire to itself.

For this sentence, I'd say

Any party that fires at/on UN troops will be drawing fire on itself.

Your use of the phrase is OK.

However, I associate 'draw fire' a bit mor
0
Thanks for replying AlpeccaStars and Clive.

AlpheccaStars, just wondering, which defintion does this usage of 'would' fall into? Is it the second one? Thank you again.

(M-W)

1 a archaic : WISHED, DESIRED b archaic : wish for : WANT c (1) : strongly desire : WISH I would I were young again* — often used without a subject and with that in a past or condition

Related Questions