I don't see much difference in the uses of the zero-article versus the definite article in these sentences. They all refer to general types. #1 = anyone who owns a shop #2 = any bird who hunts #3 = any flux in a force field emitted by a radiator
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousMy answers are yes, no, yes. Am I right? Thanks in advance!Partly. 1. Yes; 2. No; 3. No.
AnonymousMy answers are yes, no, yes.No. It's yes, no, no. 2 and 3 follow the same logic.
CalifJim2 and 3 follow the same logic.Speaking of logic, could you clarify any differences in logic between the two statements below?
Anonymous"Waves of fire" works like the phrase "a cup of coffee" because 'waves' and 'a cup' means the forms and 'fires' and 'coffee' indicates the contents.Waves do not 'contain' fire in the way that a cup contains coffee, so there is no real analogy.