0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

The natural and the supernatural

Hi. I think that we usually use an adjective after a definite article to refer to a group of people as in "the poor" (to refer to all the poor people) but in limited context I think other uses are possible (but I am not sure, though). Do you think this made-up sentence is correctly written without the parts in parentheses?

(possibly in an article dealing with a religion)

When you are focusing on the supernatural (world? phenomena? reality?), you shouldn't think of the natural (world? phenomena? reality?).
  

Top answer

Using an adjective as a pronoun is practiced, but it is normally limited to a relatively few well-used forms. These are common: the rich, the supernatural, the poor, the hungry, the unexpected, the meek . These are exceedingly odd: the tall, the sleepy, the natural, the unnoticed, the angry .

  • Using an adjective as a pronoun is practiced, but it is normally limited to a relatively few well-used forms.
  • These are common: the rich, the supernatural, the poor, the hungry, the unexpected, the meek .
  • These are exceedingly odd: the tall, the sleepy, the natural, the unnoticed, the angry .
  • As you can see, there is no pattern; it is just what has been used enough to be readily understood.
  • In your last sentence, ' natural ' works without its noun only because it is so obviously set in contradistinction to the accepted ' supernatural '.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Using an adjective as a pronoun is practiced, but it is normally limited to a relatively few well-used forms.

These are common: the rich, the supernatural, the poor, the hungry, the unexpected, the meek.

These are exceedingly odd: the tall, the sleepy, the natural, the unnoticed, the angry.

As you can see, there is no pattern; it is just what has been u

Related Questions