0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

The + nationality

Hi,

On a website, a Japanese who seems to be well versed in English says that "the + nationality" can show the speaker's indifferent attitude towards the people of that nationality.

For example, if I (Japanese) talked to people from other countries and they said that the Japanese are 'blah-blah-blah', they would be rude to me (regardless of what sentence 'blah-blah-blah' above is). Is it correct?

In her opinion, in that case they should say "Japanese are 'blah-blah-blah."

Thanks in advance!
  

Top answer

A ridiculous 'rule'. Not at all. Respect, disrespect or indifference will be shown non-linguistically-- with gesture, facial expression, or tone of voice.

  • A ridiculous 'rule'.
  • Not at all.
  • Respect, disrespect or indifference will be shown non-linguistically-- with gesture, facial expression, or tone of voice.
  • The presence or absence of the article is irrelevant.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
A ridiculous 'rule'. Not at all. Respect, disrespect or indifference will be shown non-linguistically-- with gesture, facial expression, or tone of voice. The presence or absence of the article is irrelevant.
0
Hi,

Thank you for your reply. I got it.

I get a feel that "Japanese are blah-blah-blah" can convey an unclear message (because we might think of "Japanese," without a definite artcle, as "the Japanese language".)

What do you think about it?
0
No, I don't think that is the case. Context must at the very least reveal whether we are speaking of the people, the language, or the noodles.

In this situation, the definite article works just as it does in other situations: it refers to either (1) specific Japanese people in the context or (2) Japanese people previously mentioned in the context. It is merely a discourse marker; it d
0
Hi,

Thanks!! But I am still confused... Please let me organize all the things.

In my understanding so far,

(A) whether or not " -ese" words (Japanese, Chinese, Tiwanese, Vietnamese, etc.) accompany definite articles depends on the context ("the" will be inserted in the cases of (1) and (2) you mentioned. Other than those cases, "the" is not likely to be placed.).
0
(A) ... Other than those cases, "the" is not likely to be placed.).
I did not say that. Nor did I consider or mention B, C or D. B, I would say offhand, is true. C, I would say offhand, follows the same guidelines where they refer to a nationality in the same way (if any of them do-- 'French' certainly does not refer to a singular Frenchman, where 'Japanese' does, for i
0
I'll **** in if I may, Anon and MrM. As I'm a nonnative speaker of English, I think I have a clue as to what causes your problem, Anon. English is a highly illogical language but there often is at least somelogic behind the seeming maze.
0
Hi,

Thank you for answering my additional question and giving me suggestions about B to D cases.

Your comment is helpful!!
0
Hi CB,

I have just read your post, and thank you for the informative comment!!



>The young like that kind of music. = Young people like that kind of music.

>Logically, you can put the before an adjective that denotes a nationality and the end result is the same:

>The Japanese are innovative. = Japanese people are...

Related Questions