). " Are you suggesting that mosaics and paintings are "three-dimensional" compositions, or ought to be compared to such? I can't quite see what you mean by that.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
RaenIs "with" used correctly?It seems all right to me, although I think I understand your dissatisfaction with it. The long passage that precedes the verb more or less disguises the problem, if there is one, so that the sentence as a whole reads nicely as long as it is not subjected to a detailed analysis.
Mr Wordy"three-dimensional"The reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.
CalifJimThe reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.That doesn't seem quite right with "abandons all conventions".
RaenSo back to my original question, "as with" is acceptable while "as do" is no better. Is that right?"as do" is not technically incorrect, but in my opinion it is stylistically awkward in this sentence. I still prefer my suggestion of "like".
Mr WordyCalifJimThe reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.That doesn't seem quite right with "abandons all conventions".
Mr WordyZing! You got me there!CalifJimThe reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.That doesn't seem quite right with "abandons all conventions".