0
Raen Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

The inverse arrangement when using "as" as a conjunction

I have not quite understood this use and didn't bother to until I had used it recently in an essay. It didn't get marked for grammatical error (since that's not part of the grading criteria), but I have a feeling that I didn't use it right. Here's the sentence,

This mosaic, as with most other mosaics, reliefs, paintings found in Byzantine Dynasty and Late Roman Empire periods, abandons all conventions that define three dimensional composition.

Is "with" used correctly? or should it be "do" to be in agreement with the verb "abandon"? When would you use "with"? Could you give an example? Thanks in advance.

Raen
  

Top answer

). " Are you suggesting that mosaics and paintings are "three-dimensional" compositions, or ought to be compared to such? I can't quite see what you mean by that.

  • ).
  • " Are you suggesting that mosaics and paintings are "three-dimensional" compositions, or ought to be compared to such?
  • I can't quite see what you mean by that.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
This kind of use of "with" is not that uncommon, and probably would not be marked as an error, but to me it seems a bit loose and vague -- as if the author couldn't quite be bothered to find the right words (no offence!).

You can say:

"This mosaic, like most other mosaics, reliefs and paintings found in Byzantine Dynasty and Late Roman Empire periods, abandons all
0
RaenIs "with" used correctly?
It seems all right to me, although I think I understand your dissatisfaction with it. The long passage that precedes the verb more or less disguises the problem, if there is one, so that the sentence as a whole reads nicely as long as it is not subjected to a detailed analysis.

A much simpler sentence may be needed to sh
0
Mr Wordy"three-dimensional"
The reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.

CJ
0
as if the author couldn't quite be bothered to find the right words (no offence!).


In nother word, it has something to do with the size of the author's vocabulary, haha. No, I don't take offence when people comment on my English. I always manage to find the humor in it though.

Are you suggesting that mosaics and paintings are "three-dimensional" compositio
0
CalifJimThe reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.
That doesn't seem quite right with "abandons all conventions".
0
RaenSo back to my original question, "as with" is acceptable while "as do" is no better. Is that right?
"as do" is not technically incorrect, but in my opinion it is stylistically awkward in this sentence. I still prefer my suggestion of "like".
0
Thank you CJ. Emotion: smile

I just want to play with your examples a little, just to help illustrate why I was asking.

The
0
Mr Wordy
CalifJimThe reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.
That doesn't seem quite right with "abandons all conventions".

It's possible that whoever created the said mosaic may not have been aware of the conventio
0
Mr Wordy
CalifJimThe reference is to the period when perspective was used. Byzantine and Roman paintings were created before this and would not have used perspective.
That doesn't seem quite right with "abandons all conventions".
Zing! You got me there!

CJ

Related Questions