That the rest of the book would prove exciting could be. At first I thought this might be logically justifable, but now I'm thinking that it is a dummy "it". In any case, the resulting sentence is not natural English.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
park sang joonI think it indicates "that" clause, meaning the following.?That the rest of the book would prove exciting could be.At first I thought this might be logically justifable, but now I'm thinking that it is a dummy "it". In any case, the resulting sentence is not natural English.
park sang joonI'd like to know if "it" of all sentences is dummy "it" that begin with "it could be that/ It must be that."No. For example:
park sang joonThank you, GPY, for your so very kind answer. I'm sorry; I should have specified the usage of "that."I meant the noun conjunction "that."Where "that" is a conjunction, I think the interpretation of "it" is always the same as in your original example. At least, I cannot think of any different cases.