0
Park sang joon Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

The implicit words

The U.S. chartered steamer Ta-Kiang accompanied the operation in a token show of support. The two-day battle that followed on September 5 and 6 did what the previous operations could not; it destroyed the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C5%8Dsh%C5%AB_Domain's ability to wage war on the western powers. Unable to match the firepower of the international fleet, and amid mounting casualties, Choshu forces finally surrendered two days later on September 8, 1864.
Allied casualties included 72 killed or wounded and two severely damaged British ships.

I'd like to know if the possessive "forces'" is missing after "Allied" and "the" is implied before "72 killed or wounded."
  

Top answer

" The casualties are not particularized: they're just seventy-two unfortunates, and generally no article is required before cardinal numbers. "

  • " The casualties are not particularized: they're just seventy-two unfortunates, and generally no article is required before cardinal numbers.
  • "
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
In a war of many nations (here, "the western powers") against one (here, Japan), it would be natural to call the many an alliance and name that alliance "the Allies." The adjectival form of "allies" is "allied," and that word is modifying "casualties."

The casualties are not particularized: they're just seventy-two unfortunates, and generally no article is required before cardinal numbe
0
Thank you, deadrat, for your another kind answer.Emotion: smile
"Allied casualties" dosen't mean "total casualties."
And I can't assure m
0
park sang joon"Allied casualties" dosen't mean "total casualties."
Correct. It means casualties sustained by those allied in the fight. As usual, the winners didn't bother to total the loser's casualties.
park sang joonAnd I can't assure myself "Allied casualties" make sense.
Let me assure you. "Allied" means "of the allie
0
park sang joonI'd like to know if the possessive "forces'" is missing after "Allied"
It doesn't have to be possessive in form (forces'). The non-possessive form will be taken as possessive in meaning.
park sang joon"the" is implied before "72 killed or wounded."
No! That would be a group of 72 specific people
0
park sang joonI meant "72 killed or wounded" should have been a noun phrase and the define article "the" would change it into a noun phrase.
It doesn't need 'the' to make it a noun phrase. Lots of noun phrases lack 'the'.

'people' or 'individuals' is implied. 72 people/individuals who were killed or wounded.

CJ
0
CalifJimMuch as it may seem so, 'allied casualties' does not mean that the casualties got together to form an alliance.
Where does this leave the Allied Casualty Insurance Company?
CalifJimDon't worry.
Easy for you to say. I'm going to be up all night with this.
0
deadratWhere does this leave the Allied Casualty Insurance Company?
In the lurch? I don't know. You'll have to ask them.
deadratEasy for you to say. I'm going to be up all night with this.
Well, by my watch, you're halfway there already.

Related Questions