The government should spend less the amount of money more local environmental problems, and instead increase funding into urgent and more dangerous issues like global warming.

In this day and age, more and more people believe that the government should spend less money on local environmental problems and instead increase funding for urgent and more dangerous issues like global warming. To my mind, I disagree with the following opinions.
First, the government doesn't need to cut costs on environmental issues to pour into funds for global problems like global warming. Global heating is caused not only by natural problems but also by man-made factors. For example, the indiscriminate discharge of gaseous wastes from factories along with the emissions of vehicles into the environment causes air pollution, which contributes to global warming. Cities with lots of factories and industrial areas are also heavily affected by greenhouse gases. In such cases, government money should not be cut on environmental issues but instead, be spent sensibly to deal with local pollution problems. According to scientists, this is also a possible action to prevent global warming.
Second, I believe that it is also important for the government to make available funds to deal with environmental problems. Because of the damage to the environment, human health is also threatened. Today, the cases of diseases related to environmental pollution problems are still increasing, especially in rich and developed countries. One can take the example of air pollution as one of the factors that cause mild to severe respiratory diseases in humans.
On the other hand, I also can't deny funding to tackle more alarming issues like global warming. Because if atmospheric warming continues to increase, it will lead to other serious problems such as melting ice, increasing droughts, storms, floods, etc.
In conclusion, I believe that the government does not need to cut down on the amount of money used for local environmental problems, and instead increase funding for urgent and more hazardous issues, similar to global warming.