That the seas are being overfished has been known for years. What researchers such as Ransom Myers and Boris Worm have shown is just how fast things are changing. They have looked at half a century of data from fisheries around the world. Their methods do not attempt to estimate the actual biomass (the amount of living biological matter) of fish species in particular parts of the ocean, but rather changes in that biomass over time. According to their latest paper published in Nature, the biomass of large predators (animals that kill and eat other animals) in a new fishery is reduced on average by 80% within 15 years of the start of exploitation. In some long-fished areas, it has halved again since then.
I am a little confused with the last sentence.
what does "new" exactly mean here? "Being the later or latest in a sequence" or "Never used or worn before now" ?
Can i paraphrase the last sentence like this : The biomass of large predators at the beginning of the exploitations of the fisherys that studied by Ransom Myers and Boris Worm had been reduced on average by 80% 15 years latter.
Top answer
Hi, copysnake, No, you may not. I would say "new" = "virgin," in this context. But I didn't realize there were any left.
— Avangi
Hi, copysnake, No, you may not.
I would say "new" = "virgin," in this context.
But I didn't realize there were any left.
I think the statistic would be meaningless unless the starting point represented a natural balance.
Curiously, we're not told how the 80% compares to the reduction of the combined species which are being fished.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I would say "new" = "virgin," in this context. But I didn't realize there were any left. I think the statistic would be meaningless unless the starting point represented a natural balance. Curiously, we're not told how the 80% compares to the reduction of the combined species which are being fished. (Edit. I suppose the reference explains that
I'd agree with your statement. Obviously, if a study is to be meaningful, the parameters would need to be stated much more explicitly than in the sentence we have to work with.
I expect finding a new fishery is as rare as finding a new gold mine. Do we define "fishery" as an area where fish are plentiful and commercial fishermen often work, or are we refering specifically to an area wh