0
AndyOrban Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

The cigarettes

Hi.

Suppose I am in a store and I say to an employee:

Please place this where cigarettes are.
Please place this where the cigarettes are.

I am referring to the section in the store that sells cigarettes. Can I use either no article or the definite article before "cigarettes"? I think I can do both. I explain:

No article = I am not thinking of any specific cigarettes = any cigarettes in that section.
The cigarettes = the cigarettes that are carried by the store, more specific.

Right? Thank you.
  

Top answer

It is not natural to omit the article there.

  • It is not natural to omit the article there.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
It is not natural to omit the article there.
0
Please put/place this where the cigarettes are. (There are already cigarettes there. There is a "cigarette section".)

Please put/place this where cigarettes are. (Wherever, anywhere, you find cigarettes, put this there.) (Not a likely sentence compared to the previous one. There are not likely to be cigarettes strewn about the store in various places.)

Please
0
Thank you, CalifJim.

Would it be okay to say:

In this section, the store carries carries cigarettes.

(I think it's better without the article like that).

This is my logic. If you are at a zoo and if you want to see the elephants.
Would you mind telling us where the elephants are? (The elephants at this zoo, not just any elephants)
0
AndyOrbanIn this section, the store carries carries cigarettes.
"The store" is the whole institution. The store carries products in general, but keeps them in a section. Remove "in this section".

Does the store carry cigarettes? Yes, the store carries cigarettes. The store also carries toilet paper, cough syrup, and wome
0
Thank you, CJ. Sorry for being so finicky. It's just that these things are not always so obvious. I notice that English-speaking people might be talking about something, like a school for example, and then they say:
Students have had the opportunity to learn a lot this year.
Not "the students", even though it's clear that only the students at the school are being referred to. I supp
0
AndyOrbanthese things are not always so obvious.
Understatement of the year. Emotion: smile
0
Thank you, CJ, you are very helpful and put a wide smile on my face today! Emotion: smile
CalifJimThat's a good guess.
0
AndyOrbanDo you mean as in just a good guess or is there truth to this observation of mine?
It means that sometimes nobody knows why people do the things they do, and that includes their choice of words. Given one sentence, it's anybody's guess why it came out of someone's mouth that way when there were several ways of expressing the same idea.

(Prior
0
I see, thank you very much.

(What I meant was:

I attended that school when I was a teenager. I enjoyed my experience there. It was a good school, still is. Teachers are mostly helpful and knowledgeable. Students are studious and respectful. You can send your children there.
In this example: prior context is "that school". It is

Related Questions