Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like it, by anyone? I read that all the mathematics currently known could fit 100K books...and I'm wondering why there doesn't seem to be a nice little encyclopedia of math for the layman, much in the same style as the excellent "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language." What a shame! Sure I can google things separately, but I'd have to first know that such-and-such even exists! Oh how I'd love to leisurely peruse such a handy math encyclopedia for layabout laymen on a lazy Sunday..
Top answer
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like ... exists!
— Usenet
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics??
I mean, anything like ...
exists!
[/nq] Lancelot Hogben's "Mathematics For The Million" is excellent.
Also "Mathematician's Delight" by WW Sawyer which is an easier read but doesn't cover the range of topics.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like ... exists! Oh how I'd love to leisurely peruse such a handy math encyclopedia for layabout laymen on a lazy Sunday..[/nq] Lancelot Hogben's "Mathematics For The Million" is excellent. Also "Mathematician's Delight" by WW Sawyer which is an easier read but doesn't
[nq:1]Also "Mathematician's Delight" by WW Sawyer which is an easier read but doesn't cover the range of topics.[/nq] That's the **same** range of topics.
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like ... exists! Oh how I'd love to leisurely peruse such a handy math encyclopedia for layabout laymen on a lazy Sunday..[/nq] Math for millions by Hobgen (mentioned in the other posting) takes historical perspective and scratches various math topics, however it has no
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like ... exists! Oh how I'd love to leisurely peruse such a handy math encyclopedia for layabout laymen on a lazy Sunday..[/nq] Here's one: http:
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics??... What a shame! Sure ... exists! Oh how I'd love to leisurely peruse such a handy math encyclopedia for layabout laymen on a lazy Sunday..[/nq] You might look into "The World of Mathematics" edited b James R Newman. It's been published many times, last by Microsoft Press:
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like ... exists! Oh how I'd love to leisurely peruse such a handy math encyclopedia for layabout laymen on a lazy Sunday..[/nq] Go to amazon.com search: mathematics encyclopedia get some answers... CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Second Edition Van
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics??[/nq] A good place to ask would be in sci.math. David Ames
[nq:2]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics??[/nq] [nq:1]A good place to ask would be in sci.math. David Ames[/nq] Ah, switching from rec.collecting.books to sci.math shows that the question was cross-posted. David Ames
[nq:1]Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" for mathematics?? I mean, anything like ... nice little encyclopedia of math for the layman, much in the same style as the excellent "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language."[/nq] The question is where to stop. By the time you're looking up "forcing" or "cohomology of groups" ayou aren't really a layman any
[nq:2]A good place to ask would be in sci.math. David Ames[/nq] [nq:1]Ah, switching from rec.collecting.books to sci.math shows that the question was cross-posted.[/nq] If you weren't using Google you'd be able to see that from the newsgroup headers ...