The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? example.

Somebody claimed that growing the cost of fuel is the most effective way to tackle the worldwide environmental issues. In my point of view, I totally disagree with this opinion.

First of all, I believe that developing the fee of fuel could lead to detrimental effects on people's lives. Clearly, fuel plays an essential part in human activities. It is the main factor to help various modern equipment to operate hard. As common, people have to spend their finance on it. If the cost is raised, the effectiveness of human daily work would be unstable. As results, the standard of living will certainly be lower.

Secondly, it is the fact that there are several different solutions to tackle global pollution such as declining the waste, growing trees and forests or cut down the amount of plastic used. Furthermore, the government can limit the amount of fuel allowed to use instead of increasing the payment because many kinds of fuel are non-renewable. The most important thing that is the awareness of people, if the fuel is used suitably and efficiently, anything would not be wrong.

In sum up, to my thinking, it is not a great idea to multiply the charge of fuel. To get the best result, we should immediately alleviate the world's environmental problems through direct activities in our daily lives