By comparison, new hires will be paid between $14 and $16.23 an hour. And even as they start to accumulate raises tied to seniority, the far less lucrative benefit package will limit GM's cost for those employees to $25.65 an hour.
Does my sentence below has about the same meaning?
GM has limited costs for those employees -- each can get $25.65 an hour -- whose benefit package is far less lucrative.
Thanks LiJ
Top answer
Not quite. 23 an hour. 65 an hour.
— Marius Hancu
Not quite.
23 an hour.
65 an hour.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
When gettting hired, they will be paid between $14 and $16.23 an hour. When they reach some seniority (years on the job), the limit/maximum of what they'll get will be $25.65 an hour.
That seems to be a poorly worded sentence. The sentence does not refer to $26.65 as an employee's maximum hourly wage but rather as the company's maximum hourly cost per employee. Those are two very different things.
A company's cost for an employee normally includes the money the employee is actually paid as well as the cost of benefits su
I understand perfectly what you mean, Amy. Thanks. Those writers may have to write a lot of news and they, I think, don't have enough time to care about the structure of their sentence.