0
Park sang joon Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

The analyses of a text

The following is some of the review about a Chinese drama.

Okay to start off I really liked this drama but I didn't at some parts.
Story: it starts off super interesting and appealing but as the episodes went by it dragged a little bit and I agree with the other reviewer that there were too many repeating phrases and the same crap over and over. However, I still liked it a lot. I watched the original version of this from HK and the storyline is quite similar except the biggest difference is the romance. Also, I wish whenever they added more misunderstanding between the main couple they should at least address it but no the couple just briefly overlooks the problem and then gets back together and then leave again which doesn't really bother me that much since I wanted him to end up with Cui Nong.

1. I thought "should" should have been "would."
So I was wondering what "should" means here.
2. And I'd like to know if I can put "no" before a definite article.
  

Top answer

park sang joon The following is ... The text is written is very informal style, not to say sloppy style, so don't expect it to contain perfect English. park sang joon 1.

  • park sang joon The following is ...
  • The text is written is very informal style, not to say sloppy style, so don't expect it to contain perfect English.
  • park sang joon 1.
  • , 'ought to'.
  • He (or she) has already forgotten that he has written "I wish" and is moving on to some other thought that has wormed its way into his brain, and he shows no desire to present his ideas to the reader in a coherent form.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
park sang joonThe following is ...
The text is written is very informal style, not to say sloppy style, so don't expect it to contain perfect English.
park sang joon1. I thought "should" should have been "would."
The writer really means 'should', i.e., 'ought to'. He (or she) has already forgotten that he has written "I wis
0
park sang joon the same **** over and over
That's the best appreciation of that 'literary' review.

Related Questions