0
SuperESL Posted 14 years ago
Grammar
The
"The Communist parties and workers of the bourgeois countries....."
"The Communist parties and [the] workers of the bourgeois countries....."
Is the [the] in the second sentence fragment necessary? I intend to convey the meaning that both the Communist parties and the workers are of the bourgeois countries. If I insert a [the], as in the second sentence, would it make it sound as if only the workers are of the bourgeois countries whereas the communist parties are not?
Thank you
"The Communist parties and [the] workers of the bourgeois countries....."
Is the [the] in the second sentence fragment necessary? I intend to convey the meaning that both the Communist parties and the workers are of the bourgeois countries. If I insert a [the], as in the second sentence, would it make it sound as if only the workers are of the bourgeois countries whereas the communist parties are not?
Thank you
Top answer
SuperESL Is the [the] in the second sentence fragment necessary? Hi, No. ’ Regards
- SuperESL Is the [the] in the second sentence fragment necessary?
- Hi, No.
- ’ Regards
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
SuperESLIs the [the] in the second sentence fragment necessary?Hi,
No.
You could also say: ‘Both the Communist parties and workers of the bourgeois countries...’
Regards
0
Related Questions