My corpus-based search has found matces for both but would you natives use 'the' in the following:
Discourse irony involves processing the more salient (though contextually incompatible) literal meaning initially, which is later revised to satisfy the contextual bias?
Thanks a lot.
Palinkasocsi
Top answer
That's quite a sentence! Yes, I would keep the . )
— Philip
That's quite a sentence!
Yes, I would keep the .
)
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Just an aside: "Incompatible" seems premature. It doesn't seem proper to describe something as "incompatible" without suggesting what it's incompatible with.
I understand what you're trying to say, but it comes out as, "the literal meaning is contextually incompatible." With what? Itself?
A thing may be, for example, "incongruous" all by itself. Two things may be
I really don't. The version you have just quoted is fine. I think it's necessary to identify two things, A and B, as you have now done.
If the term "contextual incompatibility" were coined by some "authority," and it caught on, and came to be understood as involving two entities (the literal meaning and the contextual meaning) then it would be okay.