0
Palinkasocsi Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

The

Dear Friends,

My corpus-based search has found matces for both but would you natives use 'the' in the following:

Discourse irony involves processing the more salient (though contextually incompatible) literal meaning initially, which is later revised to satisfy the contextual bias?

Thanks a lot.

Palinkasocsi

  

Top answer

That's quite a sentence! Yes, I would keep the . )

  • That's quite a sentence!
  • Yes, I would keep the .
  • )
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
That's quite a sentence! Yes, I would keep the. (Any might be a choice, as well, if it has not been established that there is a contextual bias.)
0
Thank you, Philip.

Palinkasocsi
0
Just an aside: "Incompatible" seems premature. It doesn't seem proper to describe something as "incompatible" without suggesting what it's incompatible with.

I understand what you're trying to say, but it comes out as, "the literal meaning is contextually incompatible." With what? Itself?

A thing may be, for example, "incongruous" all by itself. Two things may be
0
Dear Avangi,

My original post was meant to say that the literal meaning is incompatible with the context. Don't you think that my sentence could mean that?

Palinkasocsi
0
I really don't. The version you have just quoted is fine. I think it's necessary to identify two things, A and B, as you have now done.

If the term "contextual incompatibility" were coined by some "authority," and it caught on, and came to be understood as involving two entities (the literal meaning and the contextual meaning) then it would be okay.

We use the term "marital inco

Related Questions