Fish can breathe the oxygen that is dissolved in water.
I read the above in my son's Kumon's reading booklet
Is "that is dissolved in water" a defining relative clause with "that" as a relative pronoun
If we remove that, would it render the sentence ungrammatical
Would the use of "which" in place of "that" equally correct and natural?
Do we need the definite article before "water"? If we do, Could you please explain why? ??. why?
Jigneshbharati Fish can breathe the oxygen that is dissolved in water. I read the above in my son's Kumon's reading booklet Is "that is dissolved in water" a defining relative clause with "that" as a relative pronoun Yes. If we remove ' that ' , would it render the sentence ungrammatical ?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
JigneshbharatiFish can breathe the oxygen that is dissolved in water.
I read the above in my son's Kumon's reading booklet
Is "that is dissolved in water" a defining relative clause with "that" as a relative pronoun Yes.
If we remove 'that