0 "I've heard of a few cases WHERE patients have made a full recovery even after being clinically dead for well over ten minutes." 02br 02br 00Does English grammar allow us to use 'THAT' instead of 'WHERE'? Would it be considered less formal? 02br 02br 00Thanks. 0-
Top answer
0 "that" doesn't sound OK at all in your example... 0-
— Pieanne
0 "that" doesn't sound OK at all in your example...
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 Thank you for your spontaneous reply. Then would it be possible to say, 02br 00"I've just found out the fact THAT a few patients made a full recovery even from the disease"? 0-
0 Which also means a sentence such as the following is also possible, "I've been told the fact that patients have made a full recovery even after being clinically dead for well over ten minutes." 02br 02br 00Only the difference is that the one has an antecedent 'case' and the other has 'fact', which also means that it is an antecedent which determines when to use an appositi
0 I think in your example "I've been told (the fact) that...", "that" is not a relative, but a conjunction. 02br 02br 00In the example whith "case", it is: 02br 00the case (in which =) where 02br 00You can't say *the case in that. 02br 02br 00On the other hand, you can say: "it's the case (that) I studied last week"; here "that" is
0 I just screwed up here, there is no such thing as 'an antecedent for appositive-that'. What I mean is that the relationship between 'the fact' and 'that-clause' is appositive. And if you are allowed to use such words as 'fact' or 'situation' with 'that-clause', why not using 'case' with 'that-clause' and make them 'appositive'? 0-
0I'm not good at all with grammar explanations 05002br 00You'd better wait til a native sees your post. 02br 00All I can say is that when you describe a case, it's the case "in which" a patient etc etc, not the case that a patient... 02br 00Sorry I can't help you more... 010id7
0 Hi Infinity, 02br 02br 00I'm afraid this is one of those grammar "rules". 02br 02br 00Relative pronouns like who, which, that, can be used to join clauses, just like conjunctions. 02br 02br 00We can use "that" instead of "which" or "who(m)", but never instead of "when" or "where" 02br 02br 00Sorry about that. 05
0 Thanks, Abbie. I undersand that. Then let me turn the direction of my question around. What would be the concept behind your decision to choose 'WHERE' or 'in WHICH' when you connect two sentences such as "I've heard of a few cases" and "patients have made a full recovery even after being clinically dead for well over ten minutes"? 0-
0 Hi Infinity, 02br 02br 00Strictly speaking, "where" is used to introduce relative clauses after a noun referring to 01u00place02u02br 02br 00e.g. "Do you know a place where I can get coffee?" 02br 02br 00People do say "I've heard of a few cases 01u00where02u00 patients have made a full recover