0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar
That had
Salaam!
Can one use that as restrictive clause while continuing with had: Those were bad apples that had to be discarded sooner or later. (is had here used as what tense, exactly? Is there a substitute for it?)
Can one use that as restrictive clause while continuing with had: Those were bad apples that had to be discarded sooner or later. (is had here used as what tense, exactly? Is there a substitute for it?)
Top answer
Anonymous Can one use that as restrictive clause That can't used as a clause but it can be used as a relative pronoun which begins a restrictive relative clause. Anonymous while continuing with had There are no restrictions regarding the tense of the relative clause. All tenses are possible in a relative clause.
- Anonymous Can one use that as restrictive clause That can't used as a clause but it can be used as a relative pronoun which begins a restrictive relative clause.
- Anonymous while continuing with had There are no restrictions regarding the tense of the relative clause.
- All tenses are possible in a relative clause.
- Anonymous Those were bad apples that had to be discarded sooner or later.
- (is had here used as what tense, exactly?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
AnonymousCan one use that as restrictive clauseThat can't used as a clause but it can be used as a relative pronoun which begins a restrictive relative clause.
Anonymouswhile continuing with hadThere are no restrictions regarding the tense of the relative clause. All tenses are possible in a relative clause.
0
Related Questions