0
Yellowstarstruck Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

That

Hi! If you decide to use "that" what is it classed grammatically?
Thanks, Fulvio.
1. I think it is a ghost.
2. I think that it is a ghost.
  

Top answer

A conjunction.

  • A conjunction.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
yellowstarstruck I think that it is a ghost.
There are two clauses here: the main one, i.e. "I think" and subordinate "it is a ghost" connected by the conjunction "that".
0
yellowstarstruckIf you decide to use "that" what is it classed as grammatically? ... I think that it is a ghost.
The most recent term for it is "complementizer".

CJ
0
CalifJimThe most recent term for it is "complementizer".
I suppose that would make prepositions complementizers, too. If it ain't broken, why fix it?
0
yellowstarstruck Hi! If you decide to use "that" what is it classed grammatically? Thanks, Fulvio.1. I think it is a ghost.2. I think that it is a ghost.
It is also called "marginal subordinator".
0
I have given up answering questions about parts of speech. My answers would be out of date by the time I clicked on Post.
0
Mister MicawberI suppose that would make prepositions complementizers, too.
No. At least not since I've dabbled in the new terminology. Maybe they're complementizers too now, though I doubt it because they figure so often in adjuncts rather than in complements (in the morning; after the war; with a book). As far as I know there are just a few words t
0
CalifJimthere are just a few words that are considered complementizers. I believe that besides "that", "for" (It's not nice for him to say that) and "whether" (No one knows whether it's true) figure among them.
Well, I like that aggregation. It seems useful.
0
There is a hierarchy in labels: conjunction, subordinator, complementizer. Complementizer is narrower in meaning.

Related Questions