Many of these are idomatic expressions, which we merely 'parrot', if you will, without caring if it makes sense or is grammatically correct. For example 'chapter and verse', 'leaps and bounds' always seem paired - for no apparent reason. 'His comments about our project GOT '.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousAnd how about hafta, gotta, gonna, wanna, shoulda... even on the news - Peter Jennings started using them on the evening news!If I fully enunciated "have to" "going to", "want to" and other common reductions in a casual conversation, my comrades would think I was being stuck up and superior. This would not be conducive to winning friends.
Anonymous'MADE UP OF' do we really need 'UP' in there, or is it even correct?Yes, it is correct. See the following entry from thehttp://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=48320&dict=CALD, and especially the
TanitTo throw a party is a common collocation in the UK. From what I've gathered in this forum, I think it's not in the USA.Oh yes, we Americans throw parties, too!
AlpheccaStarsOh yes, we Americans throw parties, too!Thank you, A-
repharimI wouldn't call it sloppy, I would call it evolving. Every language changes over time and things that were once unacceptable change in nature. Is it really so bad to abbreviate 'should have' into shoulda? You save yourself from writing/typing/a breath of air by making it shorter. Language isn't some rigid block that is not supposed to change. It changes with cultu