0
Anonymous Posted 18 years ago
Grammar
tense
0 Hi, 02 br
02 br
00 I think usually the modal form 'could not have been' is reserved for those cases when one wants to refer things in the past. Would you say the following is taking the scene of content slightly to the past as not to make a dent on the overall applicable concept of that -- if I can put it that way? 02 br
02 br
00 Thank you for help in publishing this book. There are three persons without whose assistance this book 01 u 00 could not have been completed for publication at this time. 02 u 00 They are ... 0-
02 br
00 I think usually the modal form 'could not have been' is reserved for those cases when one wants to refer things in the past. Would you say the following is taking the scene of content slightly to the past as not to make a dent on the overall applicable concept of that -- if I can put it that way? 02 br
02 br
00 Thank you for help in publishing this book. There are three persons without whose assistance this book 01 u 00 could not have been completed for publication at this time. 02 u 00 They are ... 0-
Top answer
0 Hi, 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 I think usually the modal form 'could not have been' is reserved for those cases when one wants to refer things in the past. 02 font 00 I think you are making it seem overly complicated. Past is past.
- 0 Hi, 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 I think usually the modal form 'could not have been' is reserved for those cases when one wants to refer things in the past.
- 02 font 00 I think you are making it seem overly complicated.
- Past is past.
- 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 Thank you for help in publishing this book.
- 02 font 02 br 02 br 00 Best wishes, Clive 0-
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
0 Hi, 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 I think usually the modal form 'could not have been' is reserved for those cases when one wants to refer things in the past. 00 Yes. 02 font 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 Would you say the following is taking the scene of content slightly to the past as not to make a dent on the overa
02 br
01 font 00 I think usually the modal form 'could not have been' is reserved for those cases when one wants to refer things in the past. 00 Yes. 02 font 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 Would you say the following is taking the scene of content slightly to the past as not to make a dent on the overa
0
Related Questions