When my uncle got married in his mid-twenties, my father, who had lived in the house since he was born, moved to Chicago to work for a company there.
Taka When my uncle got married in his mid-twenties, my father, who had lived in the house since he was born, moved to Chicago to work for a company there. Is it OK to use 'lived' in the sentence instead of 'had lived'? If it's OK, what kind of difference do you native speakers detect between: (a) When my uncle got married in his mid-twenties, my father, who had lived in the house since he was born, moved to Chicago to work for a company there.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
TakaWhen my uncle got married in his mid-twenties, my father, who had lived in the house since he was born, moved to Chicago to work for a company there.Is it OK to use 'lived' in the sentence instead of 'had lived'? If it's OK, what kind of difference do you native speakers detect between:
(a) When my uncle got married in his mid
meaning that my father lived in that house before the marriage and then he moved to Chicago
Right. I agree. But if there was no such 'before-ness' in a sentence, do you think the past perfect would be still required when the sentence had '...since S+past' construction?
Example:I am from Gettysburg, Pennsylvania which is where I lived since
Why is 'simple past+for+a certain amont of period' OK, whereas 'simple past+since+S+past' is not?
TakaOpen-ended! Very interesting! So, in other words 'for+a certain amont of time' is a kind of closed end?I've never heard it expressed that way, but that's a good way of describing it.