0
Bepleased Posted 13 years ago
Linguistics Studies

Tell me the operation of "be kind of you"?

Hi,
To the question I have my paraphrase and ask your remedy for me.

[It was kind of you]----It identifies the thing to mark you with "kind"
[It was typical of you]----It identified the thing to typify you.

Thank you for your help.
  

Top answer

bepleased [It was kind of you]----It identifies the thing to mark you with "kind"[It was typical of you]----It identified the thing to typify you. Those sound like reasonable paraphrases.

  • bepleased [It was kind of you]----It identifies the thing to mark you with "kind"[It was typical of you]----It identified the thing to typify you.
  • Those sound like reasonable paraphrases.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
bepleased[It was kind of you]----It identifies the thing to mark you with "kind"[It was typical of you]----It identified the thing to typify you.
Those sound like reasonable paraphrases.
0
Hi MM,

May I take this way to think about the two sentences?

The connotation of those are :

[It is kind to the degree to mark you.]; [It is typical to the degree to typify you.]

Is "to mark you" and "to typify you" to give the range to the degree?
0
bepleased[It is kind to the degree to mark you.]; [It is typical to the degree to typify you.]
I see no indication of degree in the phrasing.
bepleasedIs "to mark you" and "to typify you" to give the range to the degree?
No, again, I see no indication of range or degree. Here, kind is digital, not analog, in meaning.
0
Hi,

could I say so?
This new model is / identifies at the cutting edge of computer technology.
= This new model identifies to the degree at the cutting edge of computer technology.
("at ...." provides the state to concern the degree)

[no more] [not any more]----of this way

[Nine times out of ten] the train is late. ----of this way
[How many times] did
0
Sorry, but you've lost me again. Maybe someone else will get it.
0
Hi MM,

I try to return you back with a regular question.

(text)This new model is / exists at the cutting edge of computer technology.
("at ...." provides the state to concern the existence of this new model)

that sentence can be rephrased this way? --- This new model has / shows / exists quality of the cuuting edge of comput
0
the state to concern the existence -- I cannot interpret this phrase.

This new model is / exists at the cutting edge of computer technology = This new model has / shows / exists qualities appropriate to the cutting edge of computer technology. -- How about that instead? Understand that the cutting edge is a place, a location.

And what does the "has
0
Hi MM,

What puzzles me is the words "have or show"(a quality).

In "She shows quality of leadership", because "quality" = something typical of her, let me have this idea that the "show" stands for the "appear"(= to become able to be seen / to come into sight or become noticeable).

In this sentence the "shows" doesn't seem to stand for demonstrates, exhibits, possesses;
0
bepleasedIn this sentence the "shows" doesn't seem to stand for demonstrates, exhibits, possesses;
Well, if you cannot take my suggestion, let's wait for another responder.
0
Hi MM,

Though learned and wise you, I still advise.

The following sentences will give you some examples of how clear the "show" doesn't stand for "demonstrates, exhibits, possesses".

1. Don't worry about that tiny stain; it won't show. (= it won't be seen / become able to be seen / come into sight)

2. His happiness showed in his smiles! ( = his smiles had his h

Related Questions