Hi, teachers.
I transcribed an interview with a professor at a medical school.
Could you please answer my questions, teacher? ??????
PROFESSOR DAVID MORRIS
(CLINICAL ACADEMIC OF THE ST GEORGE&SUTHERLAND CLINICAL SCHOOL)
1.
[02:48-02:53]
We believe we (1??)would have the capability of supplying the world from here.
2.
[03:05-03:13]
At present, we think that (2??)this treatments will render this virus non-infective. Certainly (3??)our bucurit tests indicate that.
3.
We have a great team of people who are working very hard on this. Not just here in Sydney, uh, but in Melbourne and indeed we have collaborators in France and in the United States.
4.
[03:56-04:05]
(4??)There will be focusing on people who have been recently infected with this virus. (5??)That willing crewed members of the public as well as health care workers.
5.
[04:10-04:15]
My nose is (6??)intacted. If I don't, uh, go to jail saying so, uh, yes.
(1??)Why does he add "would" here, teacher?
(2??)Doesn't he say "this treatments", which is ungrammatical? And I have one more question. Is "treatment" here a countable noun, teacher?
(3,4,5,6??)Please please correct these sentences, teacher.
??????
" Truer words were never spoken. Nor more asinine. Thanks for my first giggle of the day.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
"Vaccines are amazing." Truer words were never spoken. Nor more asinine. Thanks for my first giggle of the day.
ANNE202 (1??)would
Right. He says "would" because they have not yet been called on to supply the world.
ANNE202(2??)this treatments
"this treatment" He hammers the final "t" the way most Brits do, a