0
Wonder123 Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

Talking about two things

Help her destroy all evil monster and jump over the rolling wooden blocks that comes in her way.

The evil monsters and rolling wooden blocks are going to come in her way so the phrase "that comes in her way" points monster and wooden blocks?

Should I put a comma before that?
  

Top answer

"that comes in her way" isn't right even if "comes" is corrected to "come". Probably you are thinking of "that get in her way". This phrase applies only to the wooden blocks.

— GPY

  • "that comes in her way" isn't right even if "comes" is corrected to "come".
  • Probably you are thinking of "that get in her way".
  • This phrase applies only to the wooden blocks.
  • No comma is required.
  • "rolling wooden blocks" is not wrong, but "blocks", being normally square, may not roll well.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
"that comes in her way" isn't right even if "comes" is corrected to "come". Probably you are thinking of "that get in her way". This phrase applies only to the wooden blocks. No comma is required.

"rolling wooden blocks" is not wrong, but "blocks", being normally square, may not roll well. If you mean large, long cylindrical pieces of wood as cut from a tree, then consider using "l
0
0
Since both the monsters and rolling blocks or wooden logs will be coming one after the other alternatively on her way, he has to watch for them and destroy them instantly as she encounter them. So should I rewrite the above sentence in order to convey this meaning to the reader.
0
0
Wonder123Since both the monsters and rolling blocks or wooden logs will be coming one after the other alternatively on her way, he has to watch for them and destroy them instantly as she encounter them.
Do you mean that she has to destroy both the monsters and the logs/blocks? (Previously you said she had to destroy the monsters but jump over the logs/blocks.)
0
0
GPYDo you mean that she has to destroy both the monsters and the logs/blocks? (Previously you said she had to destroy the monsters but jump over the logs/blocks.)
She has to destroy the monster and jump over the logs/blocks. She will be encountering both the monster and logs on the same road she will be walking on.
0
0
Wonder123She has to destroy the monster and jump over the logs/blocks. She will be encountering both the monster and logs on the same road she will be walking on.
Maybe "Along the way she encounters evil monsters and dangerous rolling logs. Help her destroy the monsters and jump over the logs."
0
0
What happens if I put will I mean, assuming the event is going to happen in the future.

Along the she will encounter....
0
0
Wonder123What happens if I put will I mean, assuming the event is going to happen in the future. Along the she will encounter....
"Along the way she will encounter..."

This is correct English. However, if you write a long explanation of a game in this style (lots of "wills") then it may become tedious to read. Therefore, writing it in the prese
0
0
Ok I like your way of explaining the things precisely. I'll go with your style.
0

Related Questions