How do you feel about the sentences below? Which one sounds natural? Or do they both sound weird? [1] The smith hammered the metal flat hot. [2] The smith hammered the metal hot flat. paco
Top answer
Hi Paco, They both sound very odd! I don't get the meaning clearly. I suggest you try to say it another way.
— Clive
Hi Paco, They both sound very odd!
I don't get the meaning clearly.
I suggest you try to say it another way.
[1] The smith hammered the metal flat hot.
[2] The smith hammered the metal hot flat.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Thank you for the reply. They both sound odd to you. Huurm… actually I found this sentence in a grammar article written by Japanese scholars of the English language studies, where they discussed SVOC patterns to be read as resultiatve and depictive constructions. They say [1] is right and [2] is wrong but gives no reason to it. It is why I am asking the question above. But if th
What does "metal flat" mean in your sentences, pelase? Is "flat" a noun, does anything called a "metal flat" exist? Or is "flat" an adjective used to describe part of the result of hammering a piece of metal?
I don't know the exact sense of "The smith hammered the metal flat hot", but as for "The smith hammered the metal flat", I understand that the sense is "The smith hammered the metal until it became flat".
1] The smith hammered the metal flat hot. If I had to try to find a meaning here, I would see the smith (normally, 'blacksmith') hammering the metal until it was flat, while it was hot. It does sound, and particularly look, odd.
[2] The smith hammered the metal hot flat. Here, I see the blacksmith hammering the flat
They give only this one as the example of doubled complement constructions. I parsed it as "The smith hammered the metal into a plate while it was still hot". But I am not sure. What do you take as its sense if you are forced to interpret it?
Did you read my earlier reply? Part of what I tried to say there was that you could interpet the grammar in example 2 the same way. In other words, the grammar would be correct but the meaning would be odd.
How about 'she burned the meat black sick'? = The fire made the meat black. She was sick while she did it. (Not a wonderful e
Thank you. So can we take it simply as an elided form of "The smith hammered the metal flat (while it was) hot"? If so, I think, "hot" should inevitably come after "flat". Am I right?
paco
[PS] An additional thought. I suppose you say "He hammered the metal until it got flat while it was hot" rather than "He hammered the metal while it was hot until it got flat".