00Hello all, Kent Jones of Film Comment thus speaks about the silent movies directed by Fritz Lang: "It is doubtful anyone has surpassed silent Lang for sheer graphical power." Could you explain why "for" was used? I'd say "surpassed him in sheer graphical power"... Does "for" mean "because of"?.. Thanks in advance! Anton02pre00 0-
0here:02br 01i 00for=in terms of02i 02br 02br 00and can't be replaced just by 01i 00in 02i 0-
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
00 Thank you for the replies! I'll have to think them over to conceive... Marius: So, what's the difference between "surpass in grapchical power" and "surpass for graphical power"? Avagni: That's fun, I see nothing special with your examples... Allright, it's OK to say: "This drill is best for power", but wouldn't it be strange/offencive