0
Kooyeen Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Suppose / Imagine

Hi,
I wonder if with "suppose" and "immagine" both present tenses and subjunctives can be used. The following are all present in meaning (not past), are they all ok and idiomatic?

1 - Suppose you are on an island all by yourself. What would you do? / What do you do?
2 - Suppose you were on an island all by yourself. What would you do?

3 - Imagine you are on an island all by yourself. What would you do? / What do you do?
4 - Imagine you were on an island all by yourself. What would you do?


Comments will be appreciated. Thanks Emotion: smile
  

Top answer

While there's no replies... I think they are both possible and, independent of which verb you use (suppose/imagine), Present Simple and subjunctive versions have different degrees of probability. Completely improbable situations require the subjunctive: Suppose/Imagine you were a woman.

  • While there's no replies...
  • I think they are both possible and, independent of which verb you use (suppose/imagine), Present Simple and subjunctive versions have different degrees of probability.
  • Completely improbable situations require the subjunctive: Suppose/Imagine you were a woman.
  • If you were a woman...
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

21 Answers
0
While there's no replies...

I think they are both possible and, independent of which verb you use (suppose/imagine), Present Simple and subjunctive versions have different degrees of probability.

Completely improbable situations require the subjunctive:

Suppose/Imagine you were a woman.
If you were a woman...
0
Hi,
well, it's not true that improbable or impossible situations require the subjunctive... but I really don't know if the subjunctive is natural with "suppose" and "imagine". I'm afraid it's only ok with "suppose", so #4 is the only one that is unnatural. But I also think present tenses are much more common, so #1 and #3 are the most natural ones... Does this make any sense? Thanks
0
I see no problem of any kind with any of your examples.
Within 1 and 3, I prefer What do you do?, but your alternative raises no eyebrows either.
0
CJ:

Which one of these would you prefer?

1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?

2. Suppose you are a woman? Would you try to seduce him?

Thanks in advance.
0
Only:
1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?
0
Marius:

«Only:
1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?»

Yeah, so I just can't conciliate your reply with Kooyeen's... Is my first post in the thread right?

Sorry for bothering...
0
Hi Ant,
what's the problem? You can say "Suppose you are..." or "Suppose you were..."

Your sentence #2 is not good because there is an odd question mark...
2. Suppose you are a woman? Would you try to seduce him?

So I'm not sure what you are asking now...
0
Oh, that question mark is a typo... It should have been a full stop.

Does it make sense now?
0
Then if you're asking about these...

1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?

2. Suppose you are a woman, would you try to seduce him?


...the answer is that #1 is much better. In the second sentence there's a mixed conditional, but it's not the kind of mixed conditional that sounds too odd. Anyway, it depends on the general context. I would say

Related Questions