0
Darkmaster Posted 21 years ago
Grammar
Supply the correct verb form
Supply the correct verb form:
1> I was made (repeat) his instructions (make) sure that I understood what I was (do) after he had gone.
2> She (go) to London next week. She (be) there once two years ago.
Here is my solution, I hope someone can check it for me:
1> repeating - to make - going to do
2> will go - has been
Kind regards,
Khai Minh
1> I was made (repeat) his instructions (make) sure that I understood what I was (do) after he had gone.
2> She (go) to London next week. She (be) there once two years ago.
Here is my solution, I hope someone can check it for me:
1> repeating - to make - going to do
2> will go - has been
Kind regards,
Khai Minh
Top answer
1> repeating - to make - going to do 2> will go - has been The forms in red are not correct. Those in purple may be correct, but I wouldn't have chosen them... But then I'm not a native, as you see.
- 1> repeating - to make - going to do 2> will go - has been The forms in red are not correct.
- Those in purple may be correct, but I wouldn't have chosen them...
- But then I'm not a native, as you see.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
7 Answers
0
1> repeating - to make - going to do
2> will go - has been
The forms in red are not correct. Those in purple may be correct, but I wouldn't have chosen them... But then I'm not a native, as you see.
2> will go - has been
The forms in red are not correct. Those in purple may be correct, but I wouldn't have chosen them... But then I'm not a native, as you see.
00
The second sentence must be.
she is going to go to London next week. She was there once two years ago.
she is going to go to London next week. She was there once two years ago.
00
0
pianne said
2> will go but i didn't understand why it should be will go.
i think it must be going to because she is going to london next week and i thought this sentence is near future then it must be going to mustn't it.
2> will go but i didn't understand why it should be will go.
i think it must be going to because she is going to london next week and i thought this sentence is near future then it must be going to mustn't it.
00
It's exactly as you say, Yunus: "she's going to London next week" (not "going to go") 
00
My try:
1> to repeat(causative passive) -- to make(purpose) -- doing/supposed to do/going to do/expected to do(You may think of other variations)
2> goes/will go/is going/is going to go -- was
1> to repeat(causative passive) -- to make(purpose) -- doing/supposed to do/going to do/expected to do(You may think of other variations)
2> goes/will go/is going/is going to go -- was
00
1>repeating - to make - going to do
2>will go - has been
the forms in red are not correct and in blue are correct.
2>will go - has been
the forms in red are not correct and in blue are correct.
0
Related Questions