0
Usenet Posted 21 years ago
Usage
Substract
Hi wordsmiths
Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?
Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?
Top answer
[nq:1]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic?
- [nq:1]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought.
- Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate?
- Archaic?
- [/nq] I consider it non-native English and plain wrong.
- It might for all I know be acceptable in some countries where English has only recently become a widespread native language.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
17 Answers
0
[nq:1]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?[/nq]
I consider it non-native English and plain wrong. It might for all I know be acceptable in some countries where English has only recently become a widespread native language.
Jerry Friedman
I consider it non-native English and plain wrong. It might for all I know be acceptable in some countries where English has only recently become a widespread native language.
Jerry Friedman
00
[nq:1]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?[/nq]
If you are living in the 17th century, or in some senses the 18th-early 19th centuries, you might get away with it. But I doubt that that's the case.
The OED entry begins:
substract, v.
Now illiterate.
(pronunciation & derivation omi
If you are living in the 17th century, or in some senses the 18th-early 19th centuries, you might get away with it. But I doubt that that's the case.
The OED entry begins:
substract, v.
Now illiterate.
(pronunciation & derivation omi
00
[nq:1]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?[/nq]
I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.
Adam Maass
I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.
Adam Maass
00
[nq:2]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plainilliterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?[/nq]
[nq:1]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
You gotta cerstificate for that?
Mike.
[nq:1]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
You gotta cerstificate for that?
Mike.
00
[nq:2]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
[nq:1]You gotta cerstificate for that?[/nq]
Or, even worse, "cerstifticate". But I think that's done for effect.
Matti
[nq:1]You gotta cerstificate for that?[/nq]
Or, even worse, "cerstifticate". But I think that's done for effect.
Matti
00
[nq:2]You gotta cerstificate for that?[/nq]
[nq:1]Or, even worse, "cerstifticate". But I think that's done for effect.[/nq]
"Sustificate" in Nottingham when I grew up, with the short Midlands "u" of "bust" rather than the longer vowel of "shirt".
wrmst rgrds
Robin Bignall
Hertfordshire
England
[nq:1]Or, even worse, "cerstifticate". But I think that's done for effect.[/nq]
"Sustificate" in Nottingham when I grew up, with the short Midlands "u" of "bust" rather than the longer vowel of "shirt".
wrmst rgrds
Robin Bignall
Hertfordshire
England
00
[nq:1]illiterate?[/nq]
[nq:2]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
[nq:1]You gotta cerstificate for that?[/nq]
I think it's a stastistical anomaly.
Liebs
[nq:2]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
[nq:1]You gotta cerstificate for that?[/nq]
I think it's a stastistical anomaly.
Liebs
00
[nq:2]Hi wordsmiths Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?[/nq]
[nq:1]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
And then there's always ambition, distraction, uglification, and derision.
[nq:1]I remember hearing "substract" from many of the black kids from the ghetto in middle school. San Francisco, mid-1980s.[/nq]
And then there's always ambition, distraction, uglification, and derision.
00
[nq:1]I think it's a stastistical anomaly.[/nq]
I've heard tell that that s was moved over from "asterik".
Joe Fineman joe (Email Removed)
I've heard tell that that s was moved over from "asterik".
Joe Fineman joe (Email Removed)
00
[nq:1]Advice sought. Is "substract" for "subtract" just plain illiterate? Archaic? Acceptable in some English-speaking regions?[/nq]
Your first two guesses are right, says the OED. The extra s first appeared in medieval Latin and was in literate English usage from the 16th to the early 19th century. "Now (ca. 1900) illiterate."
Joe Fineman joe (Email Removed)
Your first two guesses are right, says the OED. The extra s first appeared in medieval Latin and was in literate English usage from the 16th to the early 19th century. "Now (ca. 1900) illiterate."
Joe Fineman joe (Email Removed)
0
Related Questions