0
New2grammar Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

substance vs chemical

0A police source told The Associated Press the substance was believed to be triacetone triperoxide, or TATP, an explosive used in the 2005 London bombings. 02br
02br
00One weapons expert said even a tiny amount of TATP could blow a person's hand off. "It is very unstable, very sensitive to both friction and shocks," Svante Karlsson, a weapons expert at the Swedish Defense Research Agency, told AP, adding the 01b00substance02b00 had no civilian use. 02br
02br
00Can I replace substance with chemical without change of meaning?02br
02br
00Thanks!0-
  

Top answer

0Hi,02br 02br 00Yes. 02br 02br 00Clive0-

  • 0Hi,02br 02br 00Yes.
  • 02br 02br 00Clive0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
0Hi,02br
02br
00Yes. In a context like this, there's not much difference.02br
02br
00Clive0-

Related Questions