Subsidiary company VS branch

0Not a branch. It could be a subsidiary or a separate entity, depending on the relationship defined in the articles of incorporation. 0-

0 MM I think It cannot be a subsidairy as the parent is itself forming an another company. So it can be a seperate company. 0-

0 This question is quite complex and depends on several factors (and the decisions when setting up companies are usually always tax related). 02br
00To keep it simple, a branch would arise where a new location, division, department, office....etc. is set up, yet still under the original company's name and is still part of that legal entity. That's to say the new 'branch' will not nee

Legally, is it the case that a branch cannot sign contracts as it has no legal entity? e.g. if a UK company setups a branch in Singapore, can the Singapore branch signs contracts with other local companies?

IT probably depends on the laws of each country.

In the UK, branches of a company can sign contracts - it is certain people/job roles that have the authority to do this or not and the head office will set the limits of who and what type of contract. Branch managers usually have a certain amount of authority. It wouldn't be very workable if a company with, say, 1000 branches over the UK,

0It is more likely to be a subsidiary. Every company is a separate entity. If a company - a high street bank for example - has banks in 5 different towns, then those are known a branches of the bank. A branch is just an outlet used to carry out the business of the company. 02br
02br
00If a company starts up another company, then that new company is a subsidiary company. 0

It depends who owns it. A 100% owned company will be a "subsidiary". The fact that a company incorporates a company means nothing, they bear no relationship to one another unless they are a subscriber.

subsidiary

subsidiary (separate entity--not a division of 1 entity)

Very well explained mate!