These are subordinate clauses: what was not clear whether those sign sequences were just the result of applying rules of grammar Anonymous [whether those sign sequences were just the result of applying rules of grammar] - is this a content clause? Yes. Anonymous would it be a closed interrogative content clause because it is marked by 'whether'?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Anonymous[whether those sign sequences were just the result of applying rules of grammar] - is this a content clause?Yes.
Anonymous would it be a closed interrogative content clause b
canadian45I don't follow how those are subordinate clauses without the presence of corresponding independent clauses.In the OP’s example, the main clauses are the entire sentences. The clauses that have been pointed out are subordinate because they can’t stand alone; that is, they are dependent on the rest of the sentence.
Aspara Guscanadian45I don't follow how those are subordinate clauses without the presence of corresponding independent clauses.
In the OP’s examples, the main clauses are the entire sentences. I agree with that . The clauses that we have pointed out are subordinate because they can’t stand alone; that is, they are dependent on
Aspara Gus....Observing the learning process is also a subordinate clause.Actually, I have an issue with the underlined being a subordinate clause. It does not have a subject and predicate. It's just a noun phrase that could be replaced with the pronoun 'that'.
Aspara GusIt’s a non-finite clause, which often has no overt subject.But if one believes that "Observing" is a gerund, it doesn't have a verb either.