It's simply logical. " You don't need doubling "were" up.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
SJ88but shouldnt you keep in line with the conditional aspect of the sentence?
Eg.: If I were a millionaire, I WOULD...
fine (because you're making a hypothesis about what you would do in that case)
If only he knew that you and I WERE brothers...
use are, IMO, there are
SJ88Marius Hancu,Both am/was work, depending on the time of being wrong.
One more thing. Since you said that it isnt necessary to double "were", then shouldnt it read, " If i were to say that i am wrong"?
Marius Hancueven if i knew where he isFor concordance with the imperfect subjunctive you need the simple past tense (was).
KooyeenDon't ask me why, it's just the way natives speakIt's because it is a fact (not a possibility).