If both of them are correct, is there a difference between the two? Thanks. Candy
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
CandyIf both of them are correct, is there a difference between the two?I see no difference in meaning. I prefer "rose" to "were to rise".
Thanks.
Candy
CandyCould you please check whether the following sentences are correct?For me, the first one has more of a "single moment/time" feel. The second has more of a "repeated moment/all
A. I wouldn't do it if the sun were to rise in the west.
B. I wouldn't do it if the sun rose in the west.
Thanks for your help.
CandyCould you please check whether the following sentences are correct?
A. I wouldn't do it if the sun were to rise in the west.
B. I wouldn't do it if the sun rose in the west.If the sun rose in the west every morning, I would get younger day by day.
If the sun were to rise in the west in 2008, the Beijing Olympic would be aborted.
CandyCould you please check whether the following sentences are correct?
A. I wouldn't do it if the sun were to rise in the west.
B. I wouldn't do it if the sun rose in the west.
Thanks for your help.
PinenutThe key difference between the tw
01cite10Candy12cite10Could you please check whether the following sentences are correct?12br
12br
12br
10A. I wouldn't do it if the sun were to rise in the west.12br
12br
12br
10B. I wouldn't do it if the sun rose in the west.12br
12br
12br
10Thanks for y