Anonymous In the second instance, it is past tense. Do we have to add 'should' for that reason? No.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousIn the second instance, it is past tense. Do we have to add 'should' for that reason?No. - CB
AnonymousThanks, CB. So you're saying that irrespective of the tense, it works the same way?It does in this sentence, anyway. You can add should if you want to.