Though I can understand the following sentence, it is really difficult to understand the associated grammar points. I mean, is the subject of "restricted" in the following sentence is "species"? Furthermore, I would really grateful if someone could provide me with some website links to learn this pattern further.
It is the smallest species of wild cat on the continent, restricted to the dense forests on the border of Chile and Argentina where it is losing its habitat to logging and human development.
Reference:-
https://www.bbcearth.com/blog/?article=the-animals-harmed-by-superstition
I think that's called participle clause , because participle clause could take 2 forms: Present Participle which means (ing form of the verb) or Past Participle (As it's used in your example) . I suggest you to look it up in detail. The first sentence and the second sentence have the same subject.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I think that's called participle clause, because participle clause could take 2 forms: Present Participle which means (ing form of the verb) or Past Participle (As it's used in your example). I suggest you to look it up in detail.
The first sentence and the second sentence have the same subject. The original sentence was like the follo
In the text just before this sentence you see the antecedent of "it", namely, the kodkod cat (also known as the guiña).
dileepaIt (the kodkod cat) is the smallest species of wild cat on the continent. It (the kodkod cat) is restricted to the dense forests on the border of Chile and Argentina where it (the kodkod cat) is losing it
It is the smallest species of wild cat on the continent, restricted to the dense forests on the border of Chile and Argentina where it is losing its habitat to logging and human development.
The underlined expression is a non-finite clause functioning as a supplementary adjunct.
Like most non-finite clauses it has no overt subject, though we understand it to be "