Hey guys so i just when i think i'm grasping this i get confused i'm reading the Huddlestone an Pullum Introduction to English Grammar and i'm assuming a subject complement is a predicative complement right? so in the example This is a clear threat our security the underlined is a predicative complement or a subject complement and i can prove this by turning it into a passive clause so A clear threat to our security this was doesn't make sense right??
Top answer
A clear threat to our security this was. Yes, that makes sense, though it is very reminiscent of Yoda English.
— Mister Micawber
A clear threat to our security this was.
Yes, that makes sense, though it is very reminiscent of Yoda English.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
ok so if i wanted to prove something was a predicative complement i could say that pc can have the form of an adjective phrase or that pc can have the form of a bare role np or that pc does not correspond to the subject of a passive clause my problem is i do these things and they don't work like i was just told i can "say a clear threat to our security this was" and it's okay so that de
Okay so "a clear threat to our security this was" or "a clear threat to our security this is" are ungrammitical? because if they are grammitically correct i don't understand how to prove that "a clear threat to our security" is a predicative complement.