WBGO-FM, 88.3 in Newark, NJ , (is YJ listening?) claims to be the best Jazz station in the US. Since it is the only Jazz station I listen to, I couldn't judge. In its promos it tells us that it "play Jazz the way you like it straight-ahead." In my playing days, in the 60s and 70s, straight-ahead Jazz was in 4/4 time and had a conventional theme-solos-theme form. The statement that we were going to do something straight-ahead meant no playing around with time-signatures, no off-beat drumming, nothing "free-form", and probably sticking to 12-bar blues form. That's fine, except it would seem that the statement that a station played everything straight-ahead should alert us that it might turn boring. Has "straight-ahead" acquired a meaning that is wholly positive; has it become a feel-good noise?
Top answer
) claims to be the best Jazz station in the US. Since ... that it might turn boring.
— Usenet
) claims to be the best Jazz station in the US.
Since ...
that it might turn boring.
[/nq] I posted something about this usage a while back.
I don't entirely understand how "straight ahead" is used in jazz, but I get the sense that the term is used at its broadest to describe anything from about 1960 on that isn't free jazz and isn't 'fusion' and isn't any other sort of style that sounds hopelessly dated now (I'm thinking, for example, of McCoy Tyner's middle period '70s stuff, which I used to like), and maybe isn't any other special genre like Latin jazz, and, I suppose, is more of a direct descendant of the hard bop and modal jazz stuff of the late 'Fifties.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]WBGO-FM, 88.3 in Newark, NJ , (is YJ listening?) claims to be the best Jazz station in the US. Since ... that it might turn boring. Has "straight-ahead" acquired a meaning that is wholly positive; has it become a feel-good noise?[/nq] I posted something about this usage a while back. I don't entirely understand how "straight ahead" is used in jazz, but I get the sense that the term is us
[nq:1]The best jazz station is WKCR, even though they only play jazz some of the time. Unless things have changed, WBGO would be the second-best jazz station in the New York area (LBMIA), despite what I said above.[/nq] I was overstating when I said I WBGO was the only Jazz station I listened to. My presets, which reflect my listening pattern, are WLIB, WBGO, WKCR, WNYC, WQSR, WNYE, and
[nq:1]WBGO-FM, 88.3 in Newark, NJ , (is YJ listening?) claims to be the best Jazz station in the US. Since ... that it might turn boring. Has "straight-ahead" acquired a meaning that is wholly positive; has it become a feel-good noise?[/nq] I don't know about that, but I find it interesting that M-W dates it to 1836: Main Entry: straight-ahead Function: adjective Date: 1836 rel
[nq:2]WBGO-FM, 88.3 in Newark, NJ , (is YJ listening?) claims ... that is wholly positive; has it become a feel-good noise?[/nq] [nq:1]I don't know about that, but I find it interesting that M-W dates it to 1836: Main Entry: straight-ahead Function: ... STRAIGHTFORWARD I wonder what musical style was described such at the time. That's the time of the "minstrel shows" craze...[/nq] This is
[nq:2]I don't know about that, but I find it interesting ... the time. That's the time of the "minstrel shows" craze...[/nq] [nq:1]This is in line with the OED meaning straight-ahead, simple, straightforward; (spec. (orig. U.S.) with reference to popular music), pure, ... The MW "typical of a given ... performer" seems to divest the term of any meaning. Consider straight-ahead Glenn Gould.[/nq
[nq:1]Did OED give an 1836 citation, or anything pre-jazz?[/nq] adjs. (when attrib. they are usually hyphened), as ... straight-ahead, simple, straightforward; spec. (orig. U.S.) with reference to popular music, pure, unadorned; ... 1836 Haliburton Clockm. Ser. i. xxxvi, No strong-minded,*straight-a-head, right up and down man does that. 1895 Outing XXVII. 200/1 A plain, straight-ahead
Unlike some recording musicians, Stitt doesn't need special mike treatment to sound bigger than he is; actually, few recording sessions have fully capture his emotional height. This, I feel, is one that has. It's straightaway blowing all the way the kind of jazz at which Stitt is most himself. There are very few other Stitt records that communicate his "in person" intensity and vigor as effect
[nq:1]Unlike some recording musicians, Stitt doesn't need special mike treatment to sound bigger than he is; actually, few recording sessions have fully capture his emotional height.[/nq] In fairness to Nat, the liner notes had "captured".