In colloquial speech, people sometimes narrate past events in the present tense (this is also sometimes used as a literary device). It can give the story a greater sense of immediacy. I am not personally a huge fan of this style, but it is not wrong.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
PreciousJonesNo, you should stick with the same tense throughout.
But I shouldn't mix tenses right?
Mr WordyIn the second case you need to adapt the words so that the sentence as a whole is grammatical and flows properly:Wouldn't it be: she remarks on what a coincidence it is?
... and she remarked on what a coincidence it was.
PreciousJonesWell, it depends on whether you're telling it in the past tense or present tense, both of which we've established are OK.
Wouldn't it be: she remarks on what a coincidence it is?
English 1b3In story writing, mixing tenses is fine, a style known as the historical present.No, if you write in the historical present then you stick to the present. You don't switch to the past tense in mid-sentence, which is what we're talking about.
English 1b3Well, I agree that people do say this kind of thing in casual speech. Whether it's good style is another matter. I maint
I'm suggesting that you can start a sentence in the past simple and move to the present simple later in the sentence:
I was walking home the other day, and all of a sudden, this guy comes up to me and says
Mr WordyI'm getting mixed messages here... what's right andEnglish 1b3In story writing, mixing tenses is fine, a style known as the historical present.No, if you write in the historical present then you stick to the present. You don't switch to the past tense in mid-sentence, which is what we're talking about.